Review the suggestions provided by your peer and provide useful input on the potential effectiveness.

Choose a famous person (or fictional character) who you believe epitomizes successful intelligence as outlined in the textbook (attached file) and assigned readings (https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol4/iss3/1/).
Illustrate why you believe this person demonstrates successful intelligence through specific characteristics or behaviors (at least three) that support your selection with regard to analytical, creative, and practical abilities. Also consider other perspectives on intelligence, such as multiple intelligences.
Explain how both nature and nurture (including social and cultural factors) may have played a role in the development of this individuals intelligence.
Predict whether this person would do well on a standard intelligence test, based on what you have read, providing rationales.
To fully demonstrate content knowledge and critical thinking, the Learning and Intelligence discussion must

Appraise course concepts explicitly, applying them to your personal experiences/observations, and cite the required readings as appropriate.
Be thorough and specific, structuring your work intentionally (with an introductory and concluding sentence or two), providing clear context, and concisely and precisely explaining relevant course concepts.
Use personal examples to illustrate as appropriate, but do be sure to provide an objective analysis too, referencing required materials and using additional credible sources as needed to support your insight. For more, see Summary vs. Analysis (Links to an external site.).
Use your own Academic Voice and apply in-text citations appropriately throughout your post.
Your original post should be a minimum of 300 words.

With regard to learning:

Review the suggestions provided by your peer and provide useful input on the potential effectiveness.
Discuss other strategies that align with operational conditioning that could also sculpt the behavior in your peers choice of scenario. Would classical conditioning be effective? Does observational learning play a role in this behavior?
If you did not post originally on this content, share you own behavioral modification plan.
With regard to intelligence:

Express your belief regarding the divergent theories and the individual your peer identified and give examples to support your view.
Regarding successful intelligence, does he or she clearly exhibit the associated characteristics of the analytical, practical, and creative components? Would this individual meet the definition of successful intelligence in a different context (i.e., are his/her skills culturally relative or would they be universally applicable)?
Regarding multiple intelligences, does he or she clearly exhibit the main characteristics of the identified intelligence? Would his or her occupation fit well?