How you have answered the concerns or questions raised in the introduction.

Paper discussing computational models and theories for artificial general intelligence. I’ve included the introduction that I had written for this as well as something that delves into why im choosing the paper topic to give a better idea of what I want. Here are the instructions provided for the paper:

Because your final paper length will be 2500-3000 words (without references), your rough draft should also be close to that.
Your thesis should be clearly stated.
Your introduction gives your reader the general background to the topic, so that the reader has the knowledge necessary to understand the more specific arguments/points in your paper.
The section after your introduction should be the main body. This is where you explain your thesis, beginning from the point you brought your reader to in the introduction.
Your argument that supports your thesis should be carefully laid out with support from scientific references. As a result, your paper will have many cited references.
The next section after the main body should be a discussion of the argument. The discussion should include: 1. A summary of your argument.; 2. How you have answered the concerns or questions raised in the introduction.; 3. Any remaining concerns or shortcomings you can see in your argument and how those might be answered in the future. 4. A conclusion – how is the world different now?
The full reference set should be listed at the end as a bibliography. These do not count towards the word length.
Your reviewers will be asked to assess you on the following criteria:
Is the thesis clearly stated? Do you have a sense of where the author is going to go from here?
Does the author give you the general background necessary to get you “up to speed” on the thesis? If the author’s topic is not in your field, is the writing still understandable?
Is the paper as a whole based on published facts, based on the scientific or otherwise academic literature?
Does the paper include at least 5 to 10 references?
Is the writing clear, with proper grammar and spelling? Does the author define acronyms and jargon? Does the author avoid unnecessary jargon?
Is the rough draft well organized (not perfect)? Does the flow of the paper make sense? Does it have a main body and discussion / conclusion?
Is the draft close to the appropriate length (2500-3000 words)?