Analyze how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.

Research, review, and analyze Anti-Miscegenation Statutes in the United States and choose two relevant cases. Then, write a 45 page paper in which you:

Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
Facts of the case.
Issues.
Rule.
Compare and contrast both cases in regard to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Analyze how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explain the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

Research cases, laws, and other legal communications using the case approach to the U.S. legal system to assess legal decisions.

Rubric:
Analyze and evaluate case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
21.6 (13.50%)
Partially analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
24.48 (15.30%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
28.8 (18.00%)
Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Analyze and evaluate case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
21.6 (13.50%)
Partially analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
24.48 (15.30%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points:
28.8 (18.00%)
Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Compare and contrast both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Points:
21.6 (13.50%)
Partially compared and contrasted both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Points:
24.48 (15.30%)
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Points:
28.8 (18.00%)
Thoroughly compared and contrasted both cases in regards to the Anti-Miscegenation Statutes.
Analyze how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Points:
21.6 (13.50%)
Partially analyzed how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Points:
24.48 (15.30%)
Satisfactorily analyzed how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Points:
28.8 (18.00%)
Thoroughly analyzed how this statute could have influenced Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explain the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not submit or incompletely explained the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
Points:
21.6 (13.50%)
Partially explained the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
Points:
24.48 (15.30%)
Satisfactorily explained the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
Points:
28.8 (18.00%)
Thoroughly explained the significance of this statute to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
Clarity and writing mechanics